Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarence E. Braasch

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 23, 1974No. 74-1000 thru 74-1017 and 74-1105PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Associate Justice.

This prosecution, brought under the extortion statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, 1 depicts a betrayal of public trust of the most alarming type to a free society: the corruption of the entire vice squad of the 18th Police District of Chicago over a period of many years.

The indictment covers the period from 1966 to 1970 during the tenure of Captain Clarence E. Braasch as Commander of the 18th Police District and names as coconspirators more than two dozen police officers who were attached to the 18th District during all or part of that period, including Braasch and three vice…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. NardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Julius L. EchelesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. McCormick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API