Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1954No. 14019_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

In 1950, pursuant to government demand, respondent changed a working schedule in the maintenance department of its Trentwood mill. Under the bargaining agreement, there were meetings with the representatives of United Steel Workers of America, CIO, the bargaining unit, which objected to the change, but respondent insisted the schedules be placed into effect at a set deadline. Notwithstanding a “no strike” clause, absenteeism in the maintenance department, where a majority of employees were affiliates of A F of L craft unions prior to organization on a plant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Associated Press v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shattuck Denn Mining Corporation, (Iron King Branch) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Radio & Mica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Southwest Latex Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API