Legal Opinion

Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1967No. 10242PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge:

By its petition Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp., (hereafter the company) seeks review of the action of the National Labor Relations Board which determined that the company had interrogated, discrimi-natorily discharged, and refused to reinstate an employee, Fred Cox, in violation of sections 8(a) (1), (3) and (4) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board ordered that Cox be reinstated to his former position with back pay and all other rights and benefits.

The company is a New York corporation which manufactures linings for men’s shirts. It has principal places of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin MacHine WorksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Portable Electric Tools, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Nueva Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Electri-Flex Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers Local Union No. 391, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Patrick Plaza Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Okla-InnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API