Legal Opinion
James v. Sun Glass Hut of California, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 16, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-B-949PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs state law claims for lack of supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Defendant also moves to strike a portion of plaintiffs ad damnum clause to bring it into conformity with the damages allowed by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. The issues are adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid their resolution. Because the state law claims predominate over the lone federal question, I decline to exercise my supplemental jurisdiction and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Alvin PROMISEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIRST AMERICAN ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Salazar v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Walter Fuller Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. The Republic of the Philippines and the Philippines Presidential Commission on Good GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Sinclair v. Soniform, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gard v. Teletronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Donaldson v. American Banco Corp., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Crocker v. Borden, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
- In Re Stat-Tech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- LaSorella v. Penrose St. Francis Healthcare SystemDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.