Legal Opinion
Gard v. Teletronics Pacing Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 9, 1994No. 93-K-1416PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Margaret Gard filed her complaint against Defendant Teletronics Pacing Systems (“TPS”) on July 2, 1993, asserting an age discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination In Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and a sexual harassment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Additionally, Gard asserts seven state law claims against TPS: common law fraud; negligent misrepresentation; violation of Colorado statutes; breach of contract; promissory estoppel; outrageous conduct; and breach of implied…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Alvin PROMISEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIRST AMERICAN ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Walter Fuller Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. The Republic of the Philippines and the Philippines Presidential Commission on Good GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Jones v. Intermountain Power ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Ritter v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Howard Ex Rel. Howard v. Cherry Hills Cutters, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Visor v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Brunetti v. RubinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Jones v. Halliburton Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Katz v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.