Legal Opinion
Crocker v. Borden, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided May 6, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-1303 to 94-1313PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
LIVAUDAIS, District Judge.
These ten civil actions were removed from state court by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (‘Westinghouse”), a third-party defendant to a third-party claim by defendant/third-party plaintiff Owens-Corning Fiberglas (“OCF”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), the federal officer removal statute. Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand all actions and sought expedited hearing on the motion inasmuch as these actions are scheduled for trial in the state court on June 13, 1994, approximately one month hence. The Court granted expedited review, heard oral…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Good v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Bartel ex rel. Estate of Bishop v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Jackson v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.