Legal Opinion

United States v. Wargo

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1981No. NCM 80 2111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLEN, Judge:

Appellant asserts that his plea of guilty to the unauthorized absence alleged in specification 2 of Charge I was improvident; the specification alleges that appellant was an unauthorized absentee from U. S. Naval Station, San Diego from 4 October 1979 until 1 January 1980. The argument advanced is that appellant did not actually *502leave the Naval Station until sometime in November 1979 and that, since the Naval Station was in his unit, he could not properly be convicted of an unauthorized absence from his unit when in fact he had not left his unit. Appellate defense counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. EmersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. LovellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. MorsfieldU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. HortonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. PhillipsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API