United States v. Smith
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Senior Judge:
This case has been returned to us for the continuation of our review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866, following an earlier decision in which we returned the record of trial for a new staff judge advocate’s or legal officer’s post-trial recommendation because the earlier recommendation was prepared by someone who was not a commissioned officer. See United States v. Smith, 34 M.J. 894 (N.M.C.M.R.1992). Unlike the two earlier recommendations, however, a copy of the valid one, prepared by a commissioned officer, was not forwarded to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DeGroccoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. EstesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. CaryNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. PineroNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003