United States v. Horton
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
FREYER, Senior Judge:
The record reflects that the appellant, attached to Commander, Fleet Activities, Yokosuka, Japan, when not performing *1040duties elsewhere, was required to remain in the spaces of what is styled the Legal Hold Facility, occupying a portion of the second deck of a multi-storied barracks building, and, when performing duties elsewhere, was required to return directly to the Legal Hold Facility spaces. The record further reflects that the Legal Hold Facility is a subdivision of the Transient Personnel Unit (TPU), which is, in turn, a subdivision of Fleet Activities, Yokosuka.
On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. LowryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. PhillipsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SmithU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007