Legal Opinion

United States v. Horton

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 16, 1993No. NMCM 91 3279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREYER, Senior Judge:

The record reflects that the appellant, attached to Commander, Fleet Activities, Yokosuka, Japan, when not performing *1040duties elsewhere, was required to remain in the spaces of what is styled the Legal Hold Facility, occupying a portion of the second deck of a multi-storied barracks building, and, when performing duties elsewhere, was required to return directly to the Legal Hold Facility spaces. The record further reflects that the Legal Hold Facility is a subdivision of the Transient Personnel Unit (TPU), which is, in turn, a subdivision of Fleet Activities, Yokosuka.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. LowryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. PhillipsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  3. United States v. GonzalezU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API