City of Springfield v. Haydon
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Commissioner Hobson —
Reversing on original appeal; affirming on cross-appeal.
The city council of Spring-field on March 6, 1925, enacted an ordinance for the improvement of Main street and Main cross street, as therein set out. Due notice was given; three bids were made for the contract; the city -council accepted the lowest hid, hut before the contract was signed a taxpayer brought a suit in the Washington circuit court attaching the validity of the ordi nance and praying an injunction restraining the council from proceeding further. The clerk granted a temporary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Fineran v. Central Bitulithic Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Lawrence County v. Lawrence Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Terwilliger Land Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Realty Savings Co. v. Southern Asphaltoilene Road Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Bonsack & Pearce, Inc. v. School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Babyak v. AltenOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.