Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Haydon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 26, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Hobson —

Reversing on original appeal; affirming on cross-appeal.

The city council of Spring-field on March 6, 1925, enacted an ordinance for the improvement of Main street and Main cross street, as therein set out. Due notice was given; three bids were made for the contract; the city -council accepted the lowest hid, hut before the contract was signed a taxpayer brought a suit in the Washington circuit court attaching the validity of the ordi nance and praying an injunction restraining the council from proceeding further. The clerk granted a temporary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Fineran v. Central Bitulithic Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Lawrence County v. Lawrence Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Terwilliger Land Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Realty Savings Co. v. Southern Asphaltoilene Road Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bonsack & Pearce, Inc. v. School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Babyak v. AltenOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API