Legal Opinion
Babyak v. Alten
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1958No. 1409 and 1410PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, P. J.
There are presented to this court two appeals on questions of law and fact. The cases arise out of one trial held in the Common Pleas Court of Lorain County, Ohio.
Harry Babyak and Dolores Babyak, husband and wife, as real property owners, and hence taxpayers of the village of Avon, Lorain County, Ohio, brought an action to enjoin the mayor and the building inspector of the village from issuing a building permit “for the construction of a telephone exchange building in any class ‘B’ residence district.”
The Lorain Telephone Company, upon its request, was made a party to the action. It is the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Launtz v. People ex rel. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- State ex rel. Rea v. EtheridgeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- City of Springfield v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Martin v. BallingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Haven v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Meador-Brady Management Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Dry Creek Valley Ass'n Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- State ex rel. Fritz v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.