Legal Opinion
Spencer v. World Vision, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2010No. 08-35532PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on August 23, 2010, and reported at 619 F.3d 1109, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With this amendment, Judge O’Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Kleinfeld has so recommended. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Spencer v. World Vision, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3Cited by43 opinions
- Cyril Korte v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Ann Garcia v. Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Starla Rollins v. Dignity HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.