Legal Opinion
Cyril Korte v. HHS
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 8, 2013No. 12-3841, 13-1077PublishedCited by 374 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals challenge the federal government’s “contraception *659mandate,” a regulatory requirement imposed by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to implement the terms of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The mandate requires employers to provide coverage for contraception and sterilization procedures in their employee health-care plans on a no-cost-sharing basis. Noncompliance carries heavy financial penalties and the risk of enforcement actions.
The plaintiffs are two Catholic families and their closely held corporations —…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by374 opinions
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Sandor Demkovich v. St. Andrew the Apostle ParishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Merritte v. KesselCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Richard Doermer v. Kathryn CallenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Charles Mack v. John YostCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
369 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.