Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. DeMint v. City of Chillicothe

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1991No. 1624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

This is an original action filed by David E. DeMint, seeking a writ of quo warranto and a writ of mandamus against the city of Chillicothe, its mayor, its civil service commission, its service-safety director and three women appointed to the position of police officer with the Chillicothe Police Department.

The parties entered into written stipulations of fact in the matter as follows. Chillicothe is a noncharter municipal corporation. Beginning October 7, 1988, there existed an eligibility list for the position of police officer within the Chillicothe Police Department. DeMint…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wygant v. Jackson Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Conroy v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1993
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API