Legal Opinion

Collins v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1941No. Appeal, 173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldrige, J.,

Opinion by

The question that presents itself in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the claimant successfully carried the burden of showing by legally competent evidence that her husband met his death as a result of an accident, while in the course of his employment, within section 301, Article III, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, approved June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 PS §411.

An award granted by the referee and board was upheld by the court below. The judgment entered thereon must be reversed.

The essential facts, which are not in dispute, may be stated as follows. Daniel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. O'Neill v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eckman v. U. S. Lock & Hardware Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Foster v. State Emergency Relief AdministrationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API