Legal Opinion

County of Inyo v. Given

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1920No. L. A. No. 6044PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was brought by the county of Inyo to have a certain street decreed a public highway and to remove and abate an obstruction thereon. As judgment went for plaintiff on the pleadings, a review of the same becomes necessary. Plaintiff alleged, in substance, that in December, 1900, one A. M. Given filed in the recorder’s office of Inyo County a plat of the Given Addition to the town of Big Pine, and that on said plat- certain streets, avenues, and alleys were delineated, including a street known as Washington Street; that subsequently Given sold lots in said addition to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Manhattan Beach v. CortelyouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Clay v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. McKinney v. RudermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API