Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-2177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years. The sanction is suspended and respondent is placed on probation for two years, under the conditions recommended by the board. If respondent violates any of those conditions during the probationary period, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically imposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API