Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 1995-1665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 604.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FORTADO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado,

1996-Ohio-295.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension with one year of sanction suspended with conditions—Conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Failure to assist disciplinary investigation. (No. 95-1665—Submitted January 9, 1996—Decided February 28, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 94-59. __________________ {¶ 1} The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CasalinuovoOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API