Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Meyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1999No. 99-1574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. A definite suspension from the practice of law with a portion of the suspension stayed is an appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct, as mitigated by respondent’s sincere efforts to treat his substance-abuse addictions and his complete restitution of the public assistance he illegally obtained. See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 568, 629 N.E.2d 430; Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrath (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 131, 642 N.E.2d 370; Akron Bar Assn. v. Bonetti (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 204, 658 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrathOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. BonettiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Akron Bar Assn. v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API