Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-1665PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Fortado asks that we stay his entire two-year suspension, citing Disciplinary Counsel v. Casalinuovo (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 367, 613 N.E.2d 177, and Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 568, 629 N.E.2d 430. Casalinuovo and Carter were cases of attorneys who, after being found guilty of drug abuse, received treatment in lieu of conviction under R.C. 2951.041. But in those cases, the respondents were sanctioned solely for using illegal drugs. Fortado is guilty of other misconduct as well; he admits two violations each of DR 1-102(A)(6) and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G), including the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CasalinuovoOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. Fortado (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API