Legal Opinion
Gonzalez Rucci v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 21, 2005No. 04-1274PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Rosaura Gonzalez-Rucci brought this action, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) and the Bivens doctrine, see Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), against the United States, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), 1 and a number of immigration officers. The complaint asserts claims for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of various constitutional rights. The upshot of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Theodore Rothstein v. Mark Carriere, and Multi-Media Distributing Co. Inc., Leisure Time Entertainment, Inc., and Leisure Time Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Venegas-Hernandez v. Sonolux RecordsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Aponte-Matos v. Toledo-DavilaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Simon, II v. NavonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Kennedy Ex Rel. B.D.K. v. Town of BillericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Barros-Villahermosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Jarvis v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICEWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Diaz-Nieves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.