Legal Opinion

Theodore Rothstein v. Mark Carriere, and Multi-Media Distributing Co. Inc., Leisure Time Entertainment, Inc., and Leisure Time Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 24, 2004No. Docket 02-7731PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLEESON, United States District Judge.

In the early 1990s, Mark Carriere and Theodore Rothstein were both engaged in the pornography business. Both were also under investigation by the federal government. In 1994, after Carriere was indicted on obscenity charges, he agreed to cooperate with the government’s ongoing investigation of Rothstein. On March 18, 1994, as part of that cooperation, Carriere told the government that Rothstein controlled a company in Brooklyn, New York that produced and distributed obscene videos.

In February 1996, Rothstein was indicted on obscenity charges in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Savino v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Brandon v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Figueroa v. MazzaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Kruger v. Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Ying Li v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API