Darryl McKenzie v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, dismissed in part, and reversed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Appellants challenge the district court’s orders enjoining their state court actions and imposing attorneys’ fees against their counsel. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss in part and affirm in part the injunctions, and reverse the imposition of attorneys’ fees.
I
The underlying facts arise from a Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk Southern”) train derailment and collision that occurred in January 2005, in Granite-ville, South…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Miltier v. BeornCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Stradtman v. Republic Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Al-Sabah v. AgbodjogbeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019