Legal Opinion
Peed v. Sullivan
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 22, 1991No. CV-89-3384PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3) for review of a final decision by the defendant Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) which denied the application of Harkless Peed for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. For the reasons set forth below, this case is remanded for a new administrative hearing.
FACTS
Mr. Peed first applied for SSI benefits in 1988; he claimed disability by reason of high blood pressure, diabetes, and arthritis. His application was denied, and this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Joan M. Jones v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Domingo Echevarria v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Dennis v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Robert J. Simmons, II v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Batista v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Hooper v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Nusraty v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.