Legal Opinion
Batista v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 18, 2004No. CV-02-3779(RJD)PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEARIE, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Maria Batista challenges the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) that her disability ceased as of March 1999. Pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings, affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ’s”) decision terminating the plaintiffs benefits. For the reasons that follow, the case is remanded for further development of the record.
Background
A. Earlier Disability Determination
The plaintiff has a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Quinn v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Crysler v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Price v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Barbour v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Brown v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.