Legal Opinion
State v. Cale
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 7, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
19 N.J. Super. 397 (1952)
88 A.2d 529
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR J. CALE, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 28, 1952.
Decided May 7, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.
Mr. Henry F. Schenk, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General of New Jersey, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.
The complaint was filed in the Municipal Court of Bay Head-Mantoloking to recover a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re CalefNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1931
- Dikowski v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Lowrie v. State Board of Registration & Examination in DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Riker v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aiello v. Knoll Golf ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Dept. of Cons. and Eco. Dev. v. ScipioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Italian Fisherman, Inc. v. COMMERCIAL UN. ASSUR. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- American Paint v. Public Serv. Elec. & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.