Legal Opinion
Dept. of Cons. and Eco. Dev. v. Scipio
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 29, 1965PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
88 N.J. Super. 315 (1965)
212 A.2d 184
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, DIVISION OF FISH AND GAME, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
DANIEL SCIPIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 14, 1965.
Decided June 29, 1965.
Before Judges KILKENNY, GOLDMANN and LEWIS.
Mr. Richard F. Aronsohn, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Messrs. Richard H. Steinberg and Barry R. Mandelbaum argued the cause for respondent,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. LabatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Atkinson v. ParsekianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Sawran v. LennonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lally v. CopygraphicsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- State v. ZucconiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Dept. of Health v. Concrete Specialties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- State v. KinsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- State v. KinsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.