Legal Opinion

Riker v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The question at issue is whether there is a tangible basis in the proofs for the finding of the District Court that plaintiff’s decedent suffered death by accidental means within the purview of a life insurance policy obligating the defendant insurer to pay certain additional benefits upon receipt of “due proof” that the insured had “sustained bodily injuries, solely through external, violent and accidental means, * * * resulting, directly and independently of all other causes,” in his. death.

The essential facts are not in dispute. Defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Capone v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Schwartz v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. State v. CaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API