Legal Opinion

Schutt v. Adair

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1906No. Nos. 14,795—(171)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Ovction in the district court for Steele county to recover $3,000 for personal injuries.^ The case was tried before Buckham, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff was rightfully upon premises occupied by defendants for the purpose of the transaction of business, and fell into an open elevator shaft, and was injured. He brought this action to recover damages on the ground that defendants were negligent in not guarding and protecting the open shaft by gates or other barriers, soleiy by reason of which, plaintiff alleges, the accident happened. Defendants had a verdict, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial."]

The facts are not involved, and the foregoing is a sufficient statement for a proper understanding of the case. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Taylor v. Carew Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Holum v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Glockner v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Davidson v. Flour City Ornamental Iron WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API