Taylor v. Carew Manufacturing Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The first count of the plaintiff’s declaration alleges negligence on the part of the defendant corporation in failing to guard or fence an elevator well in the basement of its mill, where the plaintiff’s intestate was sent to assist in putting on a belt, and also alleges due care on his part when he fell into the well and was injured. The amended count is under the Pub. Sts. o. 104, § 14,* for failure to furnish safeguards to an elevator and well-hole, and alleges that, by reason of the violations by the *471defendant of the provisions of the statute, the plaintiff's intestate, while in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Plumley v. BirgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Taylor v. Carew Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Commonwealth v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Denison v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
3Cited by27 opinions
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Berdos v. Tremont & Suffolk MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Jones v. Oklahoma Planing Mill & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kauffman v. MacHin Shirt Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.