Oakley v. Simmons
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTRELL, Judge.
The defendant, Jesse Simmons, claims that the jury erred in finding that a forty foot pole erected three hundred sixty feet from the defendant’s residence and directly in the flight path of a private airstrip on the plaintiff’s adjoining property constitutes a nuisance and that the trial court erred in granting injunctive relief.
The plaintiffs, Willard and Alan Oakley, claim that the trial court erred in setting aside the jury award of $5,000.00 in punitive damages.
Facts
The Oakleys’ and Simmons’ own adjoining land. The Oakleys have a private airstrip on their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pate v. City of MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Allen v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
- Hutchison v. PyburnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- Whittington v. Grand Valley Lakes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Daily v. Gusto Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Durham v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Hill Boren, P.C. v. Paty, Rymer and Ulin, P.C. and James Eric HammCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- JWT, L.P. v. Printers PressCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.