Legal Opinion

Hill Boren, P.C. v. Paty, Rymer and Ulin, P.C. and James Eric Hamm

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 19, 2013No. W2012-00925-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 24, 2013 Session HILL BOREN, P.C. v. PATY, RYMER and ULIN, P.C. and JAMES ERIC HAMM Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 67226 Walter C. Kurtz, Sr. Judge, By Designation No. W2012-00925-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 19, 2013 This appeal involves a dispute over an attorney’s fee involving two law firms and their client. The parties originally entered into a contract whereby both law firms would jointly represent the client as a plaintiff in a personal injury suit. Two years later, the client discharged one of the law…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Tennie Martin, et.al. v. Southern Railway Company, et.al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hannan v. Alltel Publishing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. McCarley v. West Quality Food ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API