Legal Opinion

Crystal, China & Gold, Ltd. v. Factoria Center Investments, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 19, 1999No. 41242-6-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

This case requires us to evaluate the provision in the corporation service statute, RCW 23B.05.040, that permits service on the Washington Secretary of State if the corporation’s registered agent is unavailable. The trial court found that Crystal, China and Gold, Ltd., had failed to properly serve Factoría Center Investments, Inc., and accordingly dismissed Crystal’s suit. We reverse because Crystal’s failure to serve the registered agent was not the result of Crystal’s lack of reasonable diligence, and service on the Secretary of State was therefore valid.

FACTS

Crystal was a commercial tenant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Weiss v. GlempWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Weiss v. GlempWashington Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Eidson v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, AGWashington Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API