HSP Gaming, L.P. v. City Council
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Prior Version Recognized as Unconstitutional
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On February 1, 2007, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board issued an Adjudication and Order approving applications for two Category 2 slot machine licenses in the City of Philadelphia for HSP Gaming, L.P. (HSP/Sugarllouse) and Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners, L.P. (PEDP/Foxwoods), pursuant to the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (Gaming Act), 4 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. The Gaming Board denied the applications for licensure submitted by Keystone Redevelopment Partners, PNK Pinnacle Entertainment (Pinnacle), and Riverwalk Casino, *512L.P. Riverwalk Casino…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. KimmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. City Council of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Fumo v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. DiodoroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Sourovelis v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- HSP Gaming, L.P. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Waterfront Renaissance Associates v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.