Commonwealth v. Kimmel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
Appellant appeals from a judgment of sentence, affirmed by the Superior Court, 377 Pa.Super. 653, 541 A.2d 1152, on the grounds that the trial court erred in applying the mandatory minimum sentence for a second offense committed within seven years of a prior conviction as provided by the language of the Vehicle Code. We granted review in order to examine for the first time a recurring problem of statutory interpretation which already has been addressed below by the Superior Court in Commonwealth v. Kearns, 365 Pa.Superior Ct. 13, 528 A.2d 992 (1987);…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LobiondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. MinnichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Williamson v. GreeneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. HaagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pennsylvania Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Commonwealth Department of General ServicesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.