Legal Opinion

Fumo v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2009No. 207 EM 2007, 208 EM 2007PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

On December 26, 2007 appellants former Senator Vincent J. Fumo, Representative Michael H. O’Brien, Senator Michael J. Stack, Representative John J. Taylor, Representative Michael P. McGeehan, and Representative Robert C. Donatucci (collectively, the “state legislators”) filed a “Petition for Review in the Nature of an Appeal From a Final Determination of a Political Subdivision Pursuant to 4 Pa.C.S. § 1506 and 53 P.S. § 14202.” See No. 207 EM 2007. On December 27, 2007, appellants City Council of the City of Philadelphia and Councilmember Frank DiCicco…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Rendell v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API