Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diodoro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 2009No. 117 MAP 2007PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

In the instant appeal, the limited question presented for this Court’s review is whether accessing and viewing child pornography over the internet constitutes “control” of such pornography under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d). For the reasons that follow, we hold that it does, and accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

On or about November 20, 2003, the Ridley Township Police Department obtained a search warrant for appellant Anthony Diodoro’s personal computer and seized the computer from his residence in Delaware County. Following forensic examination of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central ApltsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. SauersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API