Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Mack

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1894No. 17,303PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Vermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellant, the city of Terre liante, improved a portion of Fifth street in said city, from Main street south. Appellants Voorhees and Grimes were the contractors. Appellee owns real estate within fifty feet back from the street improved.' It is in Blake’s subdivision, a platted portion of said city consisting of a series of lots fronting on Main street, or "Wabash avenue, to the north, and running back south to an alley 138 feet. The lots are numbered consecutively, beginning on the west with No. 1, lying side by side, continuing on east to No. 16 on Sixth street. Lot No. 1, owned by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ray v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Balfe v. LammersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. City of Fort Wayne v. ShoaffIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Goring v. McTaggartIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Town of Woodruff Place v. RaschigIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wilt v. BueterIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bozarth v. McGillicuddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Voris v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API