Legal Opinion

Voris v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1904No. 20,219PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Howard Superior Court; W. W. Mount, Special Judge. Action by William H. Voris against 'the Pittsburg Plate Glass Company and Mary Bindley to enforce a street improvement lien on a back-lying lot. From a decree for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellant brought this suit against the Pittsburg Plate Glass Company, the owner of back-lying real estate within 150 feet of a street in the city of Kokomo j improved in 1893, under the Barrett law, to enforce the lien of an assessment for said street improvement, on the ground that the subdivision primarily liable therefor had, at a judicial sale on a decree foreclosing said lien, proved insufficient to pay said assessment. A demurrer for want of fapts was sustained to said complaint, and, appellant refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against bim. It appears from the complaint,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Baldwin v. MoroneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McGarvey v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Edwards v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API