Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1894No. 17,006PublishedCited by 61 opinions

From the Vigo Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellees, twenty-one in number, proceeding under- the act of the General Assembly, approved March 4th, 1893, Acts 1893, p. 341, petitioned the appellant, representing that the salaries, as provided by law, of the Honorable David N. Taylor, judge of the circuit court of Vigo county, and Honorable Cyrus F. McNutt, judge of the superior court of said county, were inadequate compensation for their services as such judges, and that such salaries should be increased as to each of said judges in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars. The petitioners prayed a hearing, as provided in said act, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Flournoy v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Grusenmeyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wilkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Gaither v. Farmers & Mechanics Bank of Georgetown Ex Rel. CorcorranSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In Re Northwestern Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Mode v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API