Legal Opinion

Goring v. McTaggart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1883No. 10,568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Appellee asked and obtained an injunction -enjoining appellant from selling a lot upon a precept issued. *201for the collection of an assessment for the expense of improving a street'in front of the lot.

The complaint was sufficient to entitle the appellee to an order prohibiting the sale upon the precept, inasmuch as it showed that the precept was void. A sale upon a void writ or precept may be enjoined. Equity interferes in such cases in order to prevent a cloud from being cast upon the title.

It appears that no legal estimate had ever been made for the cost of the improvement, and without such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardy v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wilson v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Bluffton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. City of Terre Haute v. MackIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Becker v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Balfe v. LammersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API