Goring v. McTaggart
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Appellee asked and obtained an injunction -enjoining appellant from selling a lot upon a precept issued. *201for the collection of an assessment for the expense of improving a street'in front of the lot.
The complaint was sufficient to entitle the appellee to an order prohibiting the sale upon the precept, inasmuch as it showed that the precept was void. A sale upon a void writ or precept may be enjoined. Equity interferes in such cases in order to prevent a cloud from being cast upon the title.
It appears that no legal estimate had ever been made for the cost of the improvement, and without such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hardy v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Wilson v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Bluffton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- City of Terre Haute v. MackIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Becker v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Balfe v. LammersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.