Dewey v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This case raises novel questions of law under the Kansas Automobile Reparations Act [hereinafter No-Fault Act]. The issue is whether a person who is a partner in a business that is suffering a tax loss is entitled to disability benefits under personal injury protection [hereinafter PIP coverage] of his automobile accident insurance, and if such benefits are due, how they are to be measured. The case was tried to the Court on October 21 and 22, 1981. Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 52, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
I
P…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Hand v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Sexton v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. PostenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Matthews v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miner v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Jack D. Dewey, Cross-Appellant v. Allstate Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984