Legal Opinion

Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance Companies

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1984No. C4-84-267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

After suffering injuries in a car accident respondent Rindahl brought this action for work loss benefits and for replacement service loss benefits under Minnesota’s No-Fault Act, Minn.Stat. § 65B.44(3) and (5) (1982 & Supp.1983). The trial court ordered judgment in Rindahl’s favor. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for a new trial.

We affirm.

FACTS

As a result of injuries suffered in a car accident, Rindahl was unable to continue many of her former activities. Before the accident Rindahl worked approximately 40 hours per week at an outreach…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Dewey v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API