Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Little Prairie Special Road District v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 15, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The relators present their petition for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent, L. D. Thompson, State Auditor, to register bonds amounting to $150,000 issued by the Little Prairie Special Road District of Pemiscot County. The respondent waived the issuance of an alternative writ, entered his appearance and filed his demurrer to the petition as and for such writ.
The facts stated in the petition are briefly as follows: The Little Prairie Road District of Pemiscot County was duly organized in 1917, under the statute which is now Article 7, Chapter 98, Revised Statutes 1919, and it is now…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Embree v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Royer v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re Board of Directors of Tillamook People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Inf. Gentry v. Hughesville Special Road DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 1936
- Kansas City v. Fairfax Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929