Royer v. Public Utility District No. 1
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiffs, as taxpayers, brought this action to have chapter 1 of the Laws of 1931, p. 3, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 11605 [P. C. § 4498-11] et seq., declared unconstitutional. After the action was instituted, the Pacific Power & Light Company intervened and took the same position. To the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint and the complaint in intervention, demurrers were interposed and sustained. The parties refused to plead further, and from the judgment dismissing the complaint, and also the complaint in intervention, the plaintiffs and the intervener appeal.
The act in question is one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Browning v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Paine v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Wight v. Police Jury of Parish of AvoyellesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- Drum v. University Place Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.