State Ex Inf. Gentry v. Hughesville Special Road District
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.
— ffihis is an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto instituted' by the Attorney-General for the purpose of testing the legality of the incorporation of the respondent, Hughes- Tille Special Road District. Upon the filing of the information all of the respondents entered their appearance, waived the issuance and service of a writ, and answered. The. information alleged that respondent special road district purported to be organized under and in accordance with the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 98, Revised Statutes 1919; it then proceeded to set out in consecutive order each…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palms v. Shawano CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Zimmerman v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- State ex inf. Killam ex rel. Higginbotham v. ColbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- In Re City of UniondaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- City of Brookfield v. TooeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cherry v. City of Hayti HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Honey Creek Drainage District v. Farm City Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Mississippi & Fox River Drainage District v. RuddickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- J. A. Bruening Co. v. Liberty Landing Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972