Legal Opinion
People v. Dobbin
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*893OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles J. Tejada, J.
Defendant moves, pursuant to CPL 440.10, to vacate his conviction on the grounds that he was denied his right of confrontation because a tape-recorded 911 telephone caller’s statement was admitted into evidence against the defendant in violation of his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, as held in Crawford v Washington (541 US 36 [2004]).
The People argue, however, that defendant’s claim is procedurally barred as there is no basis for the Crawford rule to be applied retroactively on collateral review of defendant’s conviction or, in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MacLinTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. Cevallos-AcostaColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- People v. SotoNew York Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.