Pitts v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SEARS, Chief Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution is violated by the admission, during a criminal trial, of a tape-recording of a 911 emergency telephone call when the caller does not testify at trial. We hold that the Confrontation Clause is not violated where, as here, the caller’s primary purpose is not to provide evidence against the accused, but rather, to thwart an ongoing crime or seek rescue from immediate peril. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals. 1
In Crawford v. Washington, the United…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
- Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- People v. CortesNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Favors v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- State v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Hatley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Hester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.