Legal Opinion

Pasquantino v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 2005No. 03-725PublishedCited by 275 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

At common law, the revenue rule generally barred courts from enforcing the tax laws of foreign sovereigns. The *353question presented in this case is whether a plot to defraud a foreign government of tax revenue violates the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U. S. C. § 1343 (2000 ed., Supp. II). Because the plain terms of § 1343 criminalize such a scheme, and because this construction of the wire fraud statute does not derogate from the common-law revenue rule, we hold that it does.

I

Petitioners Carl J. Pasquantino, David B. Pasquantino, and Arthur Hilts were indicted for and convicted of federal…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by275 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016

270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API