Pasquantino v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
At common law, the revenue rule generally barred courts from enforcing the tax laws of foreign sovereigns. The *353question presented in this case is whether a plot to defraud a foreign government of tax revenue violates the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U. S. C. § 1343 (2000 ed., Supp. II). Because the plain terms of § 1343 criminalize such a scheme, and because this construction of the wire fraud statute does not derogate from the common-law revenue rule, we hold that it does.
I
Petitioners Carl J. Pasquantino, David B. Pasquantino, and Arthur Hilts were indicted for and convicted of federal…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by275 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.