Legal Opinion

Doe v. Grosvenor Properties (Hawaii) Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1992No. 15156PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*160OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, CJ.

Plaintiff-appellant Jane Doe (plaintiff) appeals the order of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, granting the motions for summary judgment of defendants-appellees Grosvenor Properties, Ltd. and Grosvenor International, Ltd. (Grosvenor), as well as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse), on plaintiff’s claim that defendants negligently failed to protect her from being assaulted in the elevator of the Dillingham Transportation Building. Grosvenor and Westinghouse argued in the court below that they had no duty to protect plaintiff from the criminal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pickard v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bidar v. Amfac, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. First Hawaiian Bank v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. LITTLE BY LITTLE v. BellMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Maguire v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mallet v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API